トップ画像

ポケモン交換ひろばについて

自由に交換ができるWi-Fi交換交換掲示板を中心としたポケモン総合ファンサイトです!

ポケモングッズの紹介、ポケモンORASの最新情報、攻略、育成論などを幅広くポケモン情報をお届けします。

□気持ちよく交換するために

改造ポケモンを交換したり、荒らし、酷い言葉づかいなどの迷惑行為はやめましょう。
管理人よりアクセス制限をする場合があります。
迷惑行為があった場合はメールフォームにて報告していただけると助かります。

□新規スレッド作成について

スレッド一覧表示画面に表示される「件名」に
【出】6Vメタモン 【求】夢特性ポケモンといったように
【出】で自分の出せるポケモンを指定 【求】で欲しいポケモンを指定します。

「お名前」「件名」「内容」は必須項目です。

42200



現在の閲覧者数:

a7op.tapeworm.us a7op.tapeworm.us URL

2017/09/07 (Thu) 20:44:22

Hello, I’m new here (looking forward to buying your first book some time next month, and omg do you have reasonable prices on the zafus in you site shop), and to all these things (zen and its community) in general, but I think that may be the right stance for this. Too many details that are irrelevant to the correct response. If life and limb are not at risk, I say that all conflicts should eventually be resolved with kind words. However, we are humans and are not always capable. At bare minimum, it usually takes time to cool off enough to seek reconciliation. Sometimes we never get to that point. What’s important to remember is that you can not blame your enemies for a lack of reconciliation. There is almost always some set of truthful words that could reconcile the deepest conflicts. We must admit to ourselves that regardless of their failings we have either failed to find those words or held too much pride to use them. This is even more difficult in many cases than simply finding and using them. Everyone has their reasons for their behaviors, not all of them logical or moral. One must try to empathize with the failings of others, even when their failings are directed aggressively at our own person. We are best at doing this if we try to understand their motives, but if we can’t understand, we must acknowledge our own ignorance and give them the psychological benefit of the doubt. We may not always be capable of this response (I rarely am), but I believe it to be the correct one. In this case, I find it easier as an observer to keep a clear head by not reading the articles in the first place, but I will say that in the case of the admin, if I ran a site and gave people I knew the ability to post articles on it, I would let them post whatever they wanted as long as I found their postings to be honest. It’s important to let contributors have their freedom. I’m going to stay out of further specifics (as I probably should have there) as I am not qualified to speak on them and feel it muddys the basic issues involved. I only wish I was capable of what feels like such lucidity when I wasn’t half asleep. Looking forward to finally getting your book(s) when I’m less broke, D351.

a7op.tapeworm.us a7op.tapeworm.us URL

2017/09/07 (Thu) 20:44:23

Hello, I’m new here (looking forward to buying your first book some time next month, and omg do you have reasonable prices on the zafus in you site shop), and to all these things (zen and its community) in general, but I think that may be the right stance for this. Too many details that are irrelevant to the correct response. If life and limb are not at risk, I say that all conflicts should eventually be resolved with kind words. However, we are humans and are not always capable. At bare minimum, it usually takes time to cool off enough to seek reconciliation. Sometimes we never get to that point. What’s important to remember is that you can not blame your enemies for a lack of reconciliation. There is almost always some set of truthful words that could reconcile the deepest conflicts. We must admit to ourselves that regardless of their failings we have either failed to find those words or held too much pride to use them. This is even more difficult in many cases than simply finding and using them. Everyone has their reasons for their behaviors, not all of them logical or moral. One must try to empathize with the failings of others, even when their failings are directed aggressively at our own person. We are best at doing this if we try to understand their motives, but if we can’t understand, we must acknowledge our own ignorance and give them the psychological benefit of the doubt. We may not always be capable of this response (I rarely am), but I believe it to be the correct one. In this case, I find it easier as an observer to keep a clear head by not reading the articles in the first place, but I will say that in the case of the admin, if I ran a site and gave people I knew the ability to post articles on it, I would let them post whatever they wanted as long as I found their postings to be honest. It’s important to let contributors have their freedom. I’m going to stay out of further specifics (as I probably should have there) as I am not qualified to speak on them and feel it muddys the basic issues involved. I only wish I was capable of what feels like such lucidity when I wasn’t half asleep. Looking forward to finally getting your book(s) when I’m less broke, D351.

名前
件名
メッセージ
画像
メールアドレス
URL
編集/削除キー (半角英数字のみで4~8文字)
プレビューする (投稿前に、内容をプレビューして確認できます)

Copyright © 1999- FC2, inc All Rights Reserved.